Ranking Table

Vehicle tint-installation complexity

BMW X6 rates 1.47/2 for rear-glass curvature, versus 0.20/2 for Mercedes-Benz G-Class.

Andre Silva 25 September 2026 · 5 min read

Key findings

Rear-glass shape changes the profileBMW X6 rates 1.47/2 for rear-glass curvature, versus 0.20/2 for Mercedes-Benz G-Class.
Vehicle height adds a separate burdenCadillac Escalade ESV rates 1.99/2 for vehicle-height burden, versus 1.03/2 for Porsche Macan.
Glass area is another contrastTesla Model X rates 1.82/2 for glazing-area impression, versus 0.60/2 for Mercedes-Benz G-Class.

Compare the ratings

Search all fields Visible fields Rows per page Download complete CSV ↗

Choose individual fields

Initial order: Installation-complexity impression, highest first.


1	Tesla Model X	1.49	1.82	1.43	1.21	1.69	0.89	1.52	1.33	1.39	1.86	1.34	0.46	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.49 on the editorial rating scale.
2	BMW X7	1.43	1.27	1	1.14	1.64	0.97	1.67	1.18	1.34	1.95	1.31	0.45	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.43 on the editorial rating scale.
3	Land Rover Range Rover	1.42	1.3	1.13	1.09	1.51	0.79	1.47	1.36	1.4	1.88	1.31	1.5	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.42 on the editorial rating scale.
4	Land Rover Defender 130	1.4	0.98	0.53	0.96	1.69	0.93	1.29	1.34	1.24	1.94	1.31	0.75	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.40 on the editorial rating scale.
5	Cadillac Escalade IQ	1.39	1.37	0.89	1.12	1.55	1	1.59	1.16	1.25	1.97	1.2	0.37	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.39 on the editorial rating scale.
6	Land Rover Discovery	1.38	1.24	1	1.12	1.7	0.92	1.39	1.35	1.23	1.9	1.22	1.34	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.38 on the editorial rating scale.
7	Land Rover Range Rover Sport	1.33	1.2	1.23	1.12	1.45	0.91	1.46	1.37	1.34	1.83	1.31	0.89	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.33 on the editorial rating scale.
8	Toyota Land Cruiser	1.33	0.9	0.69	1.01	1.65	1.04	1.37	1.16	1.23	1.96	1.08	1.68	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.33 on the editorial rating scale.
9	BMW X6	1.32	1.26	1.47	1.18	1.42	1.04	1.41	1.39	1.39	1.67	1.35	0.75	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.32 on the editorial rating scale.
10	BMW XM	1.32	1.06	1.18	1.18	1.37	1.06	1.52	1.36	1.32	1.87	1.37	0.37	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.32 on the editorial rating scale.
11	Jeep Grand Wagoneer L	1.32	1.21	0.69	1.03	1.7	0.81	1.6	1.09	1.16	1.92	1.16	0.53	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.32 on the editorial rating scale.
12	Land Rover Defender 110	1.32	0.94	0.61	0.94	1.62	0.87	1.26	1.33	1.25	1.94	1.27	0.95	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.32 on the editorial rating scale.
13	Cadillac Escalade	1.31	1.37	0.58	1.03	1.78	0.91	1.6	1.21	1.14	1.98	1.14	1.05	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.31 on the editorial rating scale.
14	Lexus LX	1.3	0.96	0.85	1.01	1.57	1.06	1.57	1.26	1.33	1.94	1.2	0.91	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.30 on the editorial rating scale.
15	Mercedes-Benz GLS	1.3	1.32	1.02	1.12	1.56	0.84	1.46	1.15	1.27	1.93	1.17	0.76	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.30 on the editorial rating scale.
16	Infiniti QX80	1.28	1.08	0.66	1.05	1.56	0.93	1.48	1.09	1.16	1.95	1.13	0.39	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.28 on the editorial rating scale.
17	Polestar 3	1.27	1.41	1.24	1.03	1.19	0.9	1.23	1.15	1.19	1.45	1.16	0.42	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.27 on the editorial rating scale.
18	Audi Q8	1.26	1.25	1.23	1.14	1.42	0.95	1.47	1.32	1.32	1.73	1.24	0.43	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.26 on the editorial rating scale.
19	Cadillac Escalade ESV	1.26	1.39	0.51	1.02	1.8	0.94	1.61	1.09	1.12	1.99	1.1	0.43	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.26 on the editorial rating scale.
20	Land Rover Defender 90	1.26	0.61	0.57	0.71	1.4	1.06	1.15	1.41	1.19	1.89	1.31	0.66	SUV or crossover	Upright	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 1.26 on the editorial rating scale.
21	Lincoln Navigator L	1.25	1.29	0.53	0.96	1.77	0.81	1.5	0.85	1.03	1.96	0.95	0.59	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.25 on the editorial rating scale.
22	Lucid Gravity	1.25	1.64	1.16	1.01	1.27	0.93	1.26	1.16	1.18	1.82	1.11	0.31	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.25 on the editorial rating scale.
23	Mercedes-Benz G-Class	1.25	0.6	0.2	0.49	1.32	1.08	1.31	1.35	0.96	1.96	1.38	0.83	SUV or crossover	Upright	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 1.25 on the editorial rating scale.
24	Porsche Cayenne	1.24	1.08	1.19	1.03	1.31	0.91	1.29	1.28	1.34	1.78	1.24	0.95	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 1.24 on the editorial rating scale.
25	Volvo EX90	1.24	1.47	1.17	1.09	1.23	0.93	1.3	1.16	1.13	1.7	1.08	0.25	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.24 on the editorial rating scale.
26	Genesis GV80	1.22	1.15	1.04	1.07	1.36	0.96	1.35	1.2	1.22	1.73	1.14	0.3	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.22 on the editorial rating scale.
27	Volvo XC90	1.22	1.12	1.09	1.1	1.56	0.95	1.33	1.19	1.19	1.89	1.13	0.73	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.22 on the editorial rating scale.
28	Hyundai Ioniq 5	1.2	1.63	1.15	1.05	1.24	0.86	1.13	1.17	1.22	1.31	1.13	0.29	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.20 on the editorial rating scale.
29	Jeep Grand Wagoneer	1.2	1.17	0.7	0.96	1.55	0.82	1.52	1.12	1.17	1.91	1.16	0.7	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.20 on the editorial rating scale.
30	Ford Expedition MAX	1.19	1.27	0.53	0.95	1.74	0.88	1.29	0.86	0.96	1.96	0.76	0.59	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.19 on the editorial rating scale.
31	Kia EV9	1.19	1.32	1	1.03	1.43	0.86	1.25	1.14	1.14	1.84	1.07	0.28	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.19 on the editorial rating scale.
32	Lexus GX	1.18	0.88	0.75	0.96	1.49	1.09	1.27	1.22	1.21	1.92	1.12	0.81	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.18 on the editorial rating scale.
33	Lincoln Navigator	1.18	1.21	0.63	0.88	1.67	0.85	1.42	0.99	1.07	1.96	1.02	0.95	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.18 on the editorial rating scale.
34	Ford Transit Passenger Van	1.17	1.21	0.55	0.87	1.69	0.85	1.03	0.81	0.9	1.86	0.73	1.39	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.17 on the editorial rating scale.
35	GMC Yukon XL	1.17	1.22	0.46	0.99	1.75	0.86	1.3	0.92	0.95	1.94	0.93	0.8	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.17 on the editorial rating scale.
36	Kia Carnival	1.17	1.21	0.9	1.1	1.71	0.81	1.07	1.09	1.06	1.57	1.09	0.93	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.17 on the editorial rating scale.
37	Mercedes-Benz GLE	1.16	1.14	1.01	1.01	1.34	0.86	1.36	1.18	1.16	1.67	1.12	0.97	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.16 on the editorial rating scale.
38	Rivian R1S	1.16	1.29	1.17	0.99	1.41	0.88	1.19	1.16	1.14	1.75	1.13	0.31	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.16 on the editorial rating scale.
39	Audi Q7	1.15	1.07	1	1.05	1.55	0.97	1.38	1.16	1.16	1.81	1.09	0.8	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.15 on the editorial rating scale.
40	Hyundai Ioniq 9	1.15	1.35	1.06	1.02	1.22	0.97	1.13	1.14	1.09	1.42	1.06	0.83	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.15 on the editorial rating scale.
41	Maserati Grecale	1.15	1.06	1.14	1.02	1.16	0.97	1.32	1.23	1.16	1.21	1.18	0.44	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.15 on the editorial rating scale.
42	Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Passenger Van	1.15	1.17	0.47	0.82	1.69	0.86	1.12	0.83	0.86	1.9	0.72	1.49	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.15 on the editorial rating scale.
43	Cadillac Lyriq	1.14	1.46	1.11	0.99	1.21	0.93	1.15	1.13	1.08	1.32	1.12	0.27	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.14 on the editorial rating scale.
44	Honda Odyssey	1.13	1.29	0.9	1.08	1.68	0.81	1.07	1.12	1.03	1.33	0.96	0.89	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.13 on the editorial rating scale.
45	Volkswagen ID. Buzz	1.13	1.33	0.78	0.85	1.28	0.82	0.99	1.01	1.06	1.72	0.98	0.33	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.13 on the editorial rating scale.
46	Ford Mustang Mach-E	1.12	1.41	1.24	0.94	1.23	0.81	1.04	1.14	1.13	1.11	1.04	0.44	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.12 on the editorial rating scale.
47	Jeep Grand Cherokee L	1.12	1.13	0.83	1.03	1.69	0.87	1.21	1.05	1.09	1.7	0.94	0.52	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.12 on the editorial rating scale.
48	Jeep Wagoneer	1.12	1.15	0.7	0.91	1.39	0.83	1.16	1.05	1.1	1.85	1.1	1	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.12 on the editorial rating scale.
49	Toyota Sequoia	1.12	0.99	0.54	0.93	1.59	0.91	1.27	1.01	1.06	1.94	1.05	0.92	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.12 on the editorial rating scale.
50	Chrysler Pacifica	1.11	1.24	1.02	1.06	1.55	0.85	1.08	1.09	1.06	1.46	1.05	0.75	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.11 on the editorial rating scale.
51	Ford Expedition	1.11	1.22	0.49	0.92	1.73	0.76	1.26	0.85	0.97	1.95	0.88	1.06	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.11 on the editorial rating scale.
52	BMW X5	1.1	1.05	1.04	1.01	1.34	0.89	1.24	1.15	1.14	1.61	1.1	1.03	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.10 on the editorial rating scale.
53	Toyota Grand Highlander	1.1	1.1	0.95	1.05	1.55	0.91	1.11	1.06	1.06	1.77	1	0.55	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.10 on the editorial rating scale.
54	Chevrolet Suburban	1.09	1.21	0.44	0.85	1.84	0.76	1.17	0.74	0.86	1.98	0.76	1.1	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.09 on the editorial rating scale.
55	Kia EV6	1.09	1.39	1.2	0.96	1.21	0.86	1.06	1.1	1.07	1.05	1.02	0.36	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.09 on the editorial rating scale.
56	Lexus TX	1.09	1.14	0.93	1.01	1.33	0.94	1.19	1.09	1.07	1.63	0.99	0.53	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.09 on the editorial rating scale.
57	Audi Q6 e-tron	1.08	1.17	1.08	1.01	1.22	0.87	1.23	1.11	1.05	1.27	1.05	0.47	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
58	GMC Yukon	1.08	1.11	0.61	0.93	1.64	0.85	1.16	1.04	1	1.92	0.92	1.14	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
59	Jeep Wagoneer L	1.08	1.14	0.63	0.9	1.39	0.85	1.2	0.98	1.03	1.83	0.96	0.88	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
60	Porsche Macan	1.08	0.94	1.13	1.02	1.25	0.95	1.18	1.22	1.22	1.03	1.08	0.6	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
61	Subaru Ascent	1.08	1.18	0.85	0.99	1.61	0.86	1.1	1.11	1.08	1.84	1.01	0.29	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
62	Tesla Model Y	1.08	1.54	1.16	0.91	1.29	0.81	0.96	1.08	1.09	1.27	1	0.35	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.08 on the editorial rating scale.
63	Chevrolet Express Passenger Van	1.06	1.06	0.33	0.71	1.67	0.79	0.84	0.85	0.65	1.81	0.68	1.16	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.06 on the editorial rating scale.
64	Genesis GV70	1.06	1.07	1.17	1.06	1.23	0.97	1.14	1.19	1.16	1.15	1.09	0.37	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.06 on the editorial rating scale.
65	Lincoln Aviator	1.06	1.13	1.03	0.99	1.28	0.9	1.19	1.08	1.09	1.47	1.02	0.5	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.06 on the editorial rating scale.
66	Ford Bronco 4-Door	1.04	1.11	0.81	0.9	1.51	0.75	1.12	1.09	1.12	1.78	0.96	0.7	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.04 on the editorial rating scale.
67	Nissan Armada	1.04	1.03	0.55	0.88	1.59	0.87	1.18	0.92	0.98	1.95	0.97	0.56	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.04 on the editorial rating scale.
68	Acura MDX	1.03	1.02	1.01	1.01	1.38	0.91	1.05	1.16	1.07	1.3	1.03	0.83	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
69	Chevrolet Traverse	1.03	1.04	0.9	1.02	1.52	0.95	1.07	1.09	1.02	1.57	0.95	0.56	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
70	Hyundai Palisade	1.03	1.05	0.9	0.99	1.45	0.91	1.16	1.09	1.06	1.7	0.96	0.33	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
71	Infiniti QX60	1.03	1.06	1.01	1.02	1.31	0.91	1.08	1.14	1.06	1.51	0.99	0.54	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
72	Mazda CX-90	1.03	1.05	0.98	1.01	1.3	0.89	1.08	1.07	1.1	1.51	0.98	0.45	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
73	Toyota 4Runner	1.03	0.87	0.72	0.86	1.41	0.92	0.98	1.12	1.09	1.8	0.96	1.03	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.03 on the editorial rating scale.
74	Toyota Crown Signia	1.02	1.09	0.96	0.97	1.21	0.91	1.13	1.04	1.04	1.1	1.04	0.73	Sedan or coupe	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.02 on the editorial rating scale.
75	Ford Explorer	1.01	1.09	0.96	0.98	1.47	0.86	1.03	1.08	1.03	1.55	0.89	1.25	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.01 on the editorial rating scale.
76	Buick Enclave	1	1.03	0.94	0.95	1.36	0.9	1.03	1.06	1.04	1.52	0.92	0.5	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
77	Cadillac XT6	1	1.05	1.04	1.03	1.32	0.91	1.14	1.11	1.06	1.27	1.02	0.41	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
78	GMC Acadia	1	1.04	0.96	1.01	1.39	0.97	1.06	1.13	1.02	1.33	0.95	0.92	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
79	Lexus RX	1	1.04	1.05	1.01	1.33	0.86	1.05	1.06	1.08	1.34	1.02	1	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
80	Mazda CX-70	1	1.04	1.06	0.98	1.2	0.92	1.01	1.08	1.08	1.29	0.99	0.44	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
81	Mercedes-Benz GLC	1	1.04	1.05	0.99	1.19	0.87	1.13	1.11	1.08	1.18	0.98	0.88	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 1.00 on the editorial rating scale.
82	Chevrolet Tahoe	0.99	1.03	0.48	0.82	1.59	0.78	1.04	0.81	0.92	1.94	0.84	1.1	SUV or crossover	Upright	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 0.99 on the editorial rating scale.
83	Kia Telluride	0.99	1.01	0.91	0.93	1.43	0.88	1.08	1.07	1.07	1.79	0.95	0.39	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.99 on the editorial rating scale.
84	Dodge Durango	0.98	1.04	0.88	0.92	1.43	0.86	1.05	1.02	1.03	1.63	0.88	0.93	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
85	Honda Pilot	0.98	1.02	0.88	0.98	1.46	0.9	1	1.08	1.02	1.47	0.93	0.86	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
86	Nissan Murano	0.98	1.08	1.1	0.97	1.22	0.94	1	1.07	1.1	1.23	1.04	0.83	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
87	Toyota Sienna	0.98	1.15	0.89	1.03	1.51	0.86	1.01	1.07	0.99	1.32	0.95	1.01	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
88	Volkswagen Atlas	0.98	1.1	0.68	0.89	1.54	0.85	1.07	0.94	0.97	1.87	0.84	0.52	SUV or crossover	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
89	Volvo XC60	0.98	1.01	1.06	1	1.27	0.93	1.04	1.09	1.06	1.27	1	0.72	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.98 on the editorial rating scale.
90	BMW X3	0.97	1	1.01	0.99	1.27	0.91	1.06	1.09	1.03	1.17	0.96	0.91	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.97 on the editorial rating scale.
91	GMC Savana Passenger Van	0.96	1.15	0.37	0.68	1.67	0.74	0.84	0.73	0.65	1.8	0.67	1.26	Pickup or van	Upright	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.96 on the editorial rating scale.
92	Toyota Highlander	0.96	1.03	0.92	0.99	1.38	0.9	1	1.07	1.04	1.49	0.97	0.96	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 0.96 on the editorial rating scale.
93	Jeep Grand Cherokee	0.95	1.04	1.02	0.94	1.3	0.83	1.05	1.08	1.08	1.52	0.95	1.04	SUV or crossover	Upright	Framed	Installation-complexity impression: 0.95 on the editorial rating scale.
94	Nissan Pathfinder	0.95	1.04	0.89	0.98	1.41	0.9	1.01	1.06	1	1.67	0.91	1.12	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.95 on the editorial rating scale.
95	Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport	0.95	1.03	0.89	0.93	1.36	0.83	1.04	1.02	0.99	1.68	0.95	0.52	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.95 on the editorial rating scale.
96	Honda Passport	0.94	1	0.94	0.89	1.28	0.92	0.99	1.06	1.01	1.59	0.88	0.56	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.94 on the editorial rating scale.
97	Hyundai Santa Fe	0.93	1.02	1.01	0.99	1.27	0.89	0.98	1.04	1.03	1.25	0.92	1.16	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.93 on the editorial rating scale.
98	Audi Q5	0.92	1	1.01	0.95	1.21	0.93	1.05	1.09	1.03	1.07	0.94	0.79	SUV or crossover	Sloped	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.92 on the editorial rating scale.
99	Chevrolet Equinox EV	0.85	1.12	0.99	0.86	1.14	0.85	0.97	1.03	0.95	1.06	0.85	0.34	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.85 on the editorial rating scale.
100	Honda Prologue	0.79	1.17	1.08	0.85	1.11	0.9	0.96	0.99	0.93	1.12	0.9	0.34	SUV or crossover	Unknown	Unknown	Installation-complexity impression: 0.79 on the editorial rating scale.

100 rows · all fields visible

Data completeness: 3 categorical field(s) contain unknowns

Body family: 1 of 100 entries unresolved. Unknown values are excluded from group comparisons.

Rear-glass form: 30 of 100 entries unresolved. Unknown values are excluded from group comparisons.

Door-glass frame: 94 of 100 entries unresolved. Unknown values are excluded from group comparisons.

100rows in the dataset

18fields per row

1.11median Installation-complexity impression

0.22middle-half spread

Where the ratings cluster

Installation-complexity impression · 0–2 rating · 100 finite values

0.791.49

8 equal-width bin(s) across the observed range; the final bin includes the maximum. Middle 50%: 1.01–1.23. Hover a bin for its range.

First five by Installation-complexity impression

1Tesla Model X1.49
2BMW X71.43
3Land Rover Range Rover1.42
4Land Rover Defender 1301.4
5Cadillac Escalade IQ1.39

Tied scores retain source order; listing first does not break a tie. Read across each row before choosing a shortlist.

Distribution across numeric fields

Quartiles describe the middle half of each field. Units differ; compare values within a row of this summary, not across unrelated fields.

Field	Valid n	Minimum	25th pct.	Median	75th pct.	Maximum
Installation-complexity impression (0–2 rating)	100	0.79	1.01	1.11	1.23	1.49
Glazing-area impression (0–2 rating)	100	0.6	1.04	1.12	1.24	1.82
Rear-glass curvature (0–2 rating)	100	0.2	0.7	0.95	1.06	1.47
Side-window complexity (0–2 rating)	100	0.49	0.93	0.99	1.03	1.21
Window-count burden (0–2 rating)	100	1.11	1.29	1.42	1.59	1.84
Interior-access difficulty (0–2 rating)	100	0.74	0.85	0.9	0.93	1.09
Trim-interface complexity (0–2 rating)	100	0.84	1.05	1.15	1.3	1.67
Edge-finishing difficulty (0–2 rating)	100	0.73	1.06	1.09	1.16	1.41
Heat-forming complexity (0–2 rating)	100	0.65	1.03	1.08	1.16	1.4
Vehicle-height burden (0–2 rating)	100	1.03	1.4	1.73	1.9	1.99
Film-waste sensitivity (0–2 rating)	100	0.67	0.95	1.02	1.13	1.38
Configuration ambiguity (0–2 rating)	100	0.25	0.44	0.73	0.95	1.68

Field definitions and analysis method

rank: Position after sorting the ranking field; ties are not evidence of a real difference.
Entry: Identity of this comparison entry.
Installation-complexity impression: 0: Simple conventional glass geometry and access; 1: Several moderately challenging glass regions; 2: Many complex curves or obstructed glass regions
Glazing-area impression: 0: Small exposed glazing dominates the body form; 1: Conventional glazing proportions; 2: Large expansive glazing dominates the body form
Rear-glass curvature: 0: Flat or minimally curved rear glazing identity; 1: Moderately curved rear glazing; 2: Strong compound-curved rear glazing identity
Side-window complexity: 0: Few simple rectangular side windows; 1: Several varied side-window shapes; 2: Many small irregular or compound side-window shapes
Window-count burden: 0: Few distinct glass sections; 1: Conventional number of glass sections; 2: Many separate glass sections including quarter windows
Interior-access difficulty: 0: Open unobstructed approach to glass edges; 1: Some interior obstruction near edges; 2: Tight confined approaches dominate glass-edge access
Trim-interface complexity: 0: Simple accessible surrounding trim geometry; 1: Several intersecting trim regions; 2: Elaborate overlapping trim regions surround glass
Edge-finishing difficulty: 0: Long simple accessible glass edges; 1: Some narrow corners or edge interruptions; 2: Many tight corners and obstructed glass edges
Heat-forming complexity: 0: Mostly flat glass geometry; 1: Moderate curvature across key panels; 2: Strong compound curvature across key panels
Vehicle-height burden: 0: Low body makes exterior glass readily reachable; 1: Conventional vehicle-height access; 2: Tall body makes upper glass difficult to reach
Film-waste sensitivity: 0: Regular rectangular panel shapes; 1: Some irregular panel outlines; 2: Strongly irregular outlines increase layout offcuts
Configuration ambiguity: 0: Name identifies a specific body and generation; 1: Several body or trim variants plausible; 2: Broad name spans many glazing layouts
Body family: Sedan or coupe: Conventional enclosed passenger-car body; Hatchback or wagon: Extended rear cargo passenger-car body; SUV or crossover: Sport-utility or crossover body; Pickup or van: Pickup truck or van body; Unknown: Identity or classification is uncertain, or no listed category fits
Rear-glass form: Upright: Near-vertical rear glass identity; Sloped: Sloping rear glass identity; Wraparound: Wraparound or strongly curved rear glass identity; Unknown: Identity or classification is uncertain, or no listed category fits
Door-glass frame: Framed: Door glass enclosed by a visible upper frame; Frameless: Door glass lacks an upper door frame; Mixed: Named vehicle family spans both frame patterns; Unknown: Identity or classification is uncertain, or no listed category fits
rationale: Explanation of the row’s ratings under the stated criteria.

Statistics are computed from the published finite values. Quantiles use linear interpolation at (n − 1) × p. Associations can reflect shared assessment assumptions; no statistical significance or real-world causal effect is implied. The article explains the assessment method and limitations.

BMW X6 rates 1.47/2 for rear-glass curvature, versus 0.20/2 for Mercedes-Benz G-Class. Cadillac Escalade ESV rates 1.99/2 for vehicle-height burden, versus 1.03/2 for Porsche Macan. Tesla Model X rates 1.82/2 for glazing-area impression, versus 0.60/2 for Mercedes-Benz G-Class.

Installation-complexity impression and window-count burden have a tie-aware Spearman rank correlation of 0.42. On our 0–2 rating scales, Tesla Model X receives 1.49 for installation-complexity impression and 1.69 for window-count burden; Honda Prologue receives 0.79 and 1.11, respectively.

Installation-complexity impression has a positive but far from one-to-one rank association with window-count burden. Panel count is part of the comparison without settling the overall order. Curvature, edge finishing and access provide other useful distinctions to examine together. The selection is heavily weighted toward SUVs and crossovers, which limits comparisons across the broader passenger-car market. Start with a row that matches the actual generation and body style, then resolve the unknown glazing details. The ratings can organize questions for an installer, but they cannot replace an inspection or establish what a job should cost. Missing frame information should remain open rather than being assigned a convenient default.

SUVs and crossovers account for 89/100 rows. Door-glass frame is Unknown for 94/100 names. A universal price or labor ranking would be a poor reading of this selection. Its useful scope is a comparison of geometry questions within a mostly SUV-oriented catalog, with unresolved details clearly retained.

Body family is unresolved for 1/100 entries, leaving 99 rows for named-group comparisons. The primary rating has an exact tie spanning 6 entries; rounding to one decimal puts as many as 27 together. Read nearby positions as broad clusters rather than distinct tiers.

What the ratings show

The analysis covers 100 rows and 18 fields.

The spread in Installation-complexity impression

Across 100 usable values, Installation-complexity impression runs from 0.79 to 1.49 on the 0–2 rating scale. The median is 1.11; the middle half of rows falls between 1.01 and 1.23. That middle-half range is 0.22, compared with a full range of 0.7. There are 0 missing or non-finite values in this field.

The rank is a sorting aid, not a confidence statement. Small gaps between subjective ratings do not establish meaningful differences. Use the full row and its assumptions when making a shortlist.

Comparing Body family groups

The Pickup or van group has a median Installation-complexity impression of 1.13 across 9 rows; SUV or crossover has 1.1 across 89. Their medians differ by 0.03. The middle half of Pickup or van runs from 1.06 to 1.15, compared with 1 to 1.25 for SUV or crossover. This comparison includes 2 groups with at least five rows each; 2 rows are outside those groups (including unknown labels and small groups). Different group composition can explain the difference, so it is not an isolated effect of the group label.

Comparing Rear-glass form groups

The Upright group has a median Installation-complexity impression of 1.15 across 48 rows; Sloped has 1.08 across 22. Their medians differ by 0.07. The middle half of Upright runs from 1.06 to 1.26, compared with 0.98 to 1.19 for Sloped. This comparison includes 2 groups with at least five rows each; 30 rows are outside those groups (including unknown labels and small groups). Different group composition can explain the difference, so it is not an isolated effect of the group label.

Which fields move together

Trim-interface complexity and Installation-complexity impression: Spearman rho = 0.84 across 100 complete pairs. Higher values tend to accompany higher Installation-complexity impression values within these rows.
Film-waste sensitivity and Installation-complexity impression: Spearman rho = 0.76 across 100 complete pairs. Higher values tend to accompany higher Installation-complexity impression values within these rows.
Heat-forming complexity and Installation-complexity impression: Spearman rho = 0.69 across 100 complete pairs. Higher values tend to accompany higher Installation-complexity impression values within these rows.
Vehicle-height burden and Installation-complexity impression: Spearman rho = 0.60 across 100 complete pairs. Higher values tend to accompany higher Installation-complexity impression values within these rows.

These are descriptive associations, not causal findings. They can reflect the assessment’s shared assumptions, linked scoring rubrics or repeated scenario structure. Correlated ratings are not independent confirmation of one another.

How the shortlist changes with a constraint

The following comparisons retain the published Installation-complexity impression ordering but split the dataset at each secondary field’s median. Choose the side that matches your use case; neither side is assumed to be better.

With Trim-interface complexity at or below 1.15, 50 rows qualify. Land Rover Defender 90 is the first listed of 1 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.26 for Installation-complexity impression; its Trim-interface complexity is 1.15.
With Trim-interface complexity above 1.15, 50 rows qualify. Tesla Model X is the first listed of 1 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.49 for Installation-complexity impression; its Trim-interface complexity is 1.52.
With Film-waste sensitivity at or below 1.02, 52 rows qualify. Lincoln Navigator L is the first listed of 1 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.25 for Installation-complexity impression; its Film-waste sensitivity is 0.95.
With Film-waste sensitivity above 1.02, 48 rows qualify. Tesla Model X is the first listed of 1 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.49 for Installation-complexity impression; its Film-waste sensitivity is 1.34.
With Heat-forming complexity at or below 1.08, 54 rows qualify. Lincoln Navigator L is the first listed of 2 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.25 for Installation-complexity impression; its Heat-forming complexity is 1.03.
With Heat-forming complexity above 1.08, 46 rows qualify. Tesla Model X is the first listed of 1 row(s) tied at that subset’s highest value of 1.49 for Installation-complexity impression; its Heat-forming complexity is 1.39.

Reproducing the analysis

Download the complete CSV, retain finite numeric values, and sort the ranking field in the descending direction. Quantiles use linear interpolation at (n − 1) × p; group statistics use the same method. Spearman correlations use average ranks for ties and use only complete numeric pairs. No significance tests or confidence intervals are reported: these assessments are not a random sample of measured outcomes.

How we compared the entries

We use AI-assisted scoring against the criteria shown for each column. These ratings are subjective editorial assessments, not physical tests or measurements. The assessments use candidate names and descriptions; no independent product testing or field research was performed.

Catalog scope: model-suggested identities from the original cohort; not independently verified.

Scores follow the ordered criteria shown in the table; decimals indicate positions between those anchors, not measurement precision. Associations describe patterns in these assessments and do not establish cause. Category labels and candidate identities can contain errors.